India delivery • Serving clients globally
info@eakait.com   |   +91 998 973 3315
VAPT Services India

VAPT Services in India that turn technical findings into prioritized remediation

EAKA IT provides vulnerability assessment and penetration testing for applications, APIs, infrastructure and selected cloud environments, with clear evidence, risk context, remediation guidance and retesting support.

WebApplication testing
APISecurity testing
NetworkInfrastructure scope
EvidenceReproducible findings
RetestClosure validation
Why organizations engage us

A useful VAPT engagement must do more than produce a scanner export

CHALLENGE 01

Unprioritized findings

Long vulnerability lists without business context make remediation planning difficult.

CHALLENGE 02

Incomplete attack paths

Automated scanning can miss chained weaknesses, authorization flaws and context-dependent issues.

CHALLENGE 03

Weak evidence

Findings without reproducible proof create friction between security, engineering and audit teams.

CHALLENGE 04

No closure loop

Without retesting, organizations cannot confidently demonstrate that critical issues were fixed.

Scope

What EAKA IT can assess, implement or operate

Scope is tailored to your current environment, risk profile, technology stack and internal operating model.

01

Web Application VAPT

Assess externally or internally exposed web applications.

  • Authentication and session controls
  • Input handling and common web weaknesses
  • Authorization and access-control testing
  • Business-logic review within agreed scope
02

API Security Testing

Test APIs as a distinct attack surface.

  • Authentication and token handling
  • Authorization and object-level access
  • Input and schema abuse scenarios
  • Rate, exposure and error-handling review
03

Infrastructure VAPT

Assess network and infrastructure exposure.

  • External and internal vulnerability assessment
  • Service and configuration review
  • Exposure validation
  • Risk-based manual verification
04

Cloud Security Testing

Review selected cloud configurations and attack paths.

  • Identity and access exposure
  • Public-resource review
  • Configuration and service risks
  • Evidence-based remediation guidance
05

Risk Prioritization

Translate technical severity into action.

  • Technical severity scoring
  • Asset and data context
  • Exploitability and exposure considerations
  • Remediation sequencing
06

Retesting & Closure

Validate remediation before closure.

  • Targeted retest of agreed findings
  • Updated evidence
  • Residual-risk documentation
  • Closure status report
Engagement outputs

What you receive

Every engagement is designed to leave you with clear ownership, documented evidence and prioritized next actions.

✓ Executive summary with priority risks
✓ Detailed technical vulnerability report
✓ Reproduction steps and evidence where appropriate
✓ Severity and business-context prioritization
✓ Remediation recommendations for engineering teams
✓ Retesting and closure report for agreed findings
Delivery approach

A practical path from current state to measurable improvement

We start with evidence and business context, then sequence improvements by risk, dependency and implementation effort.

01 • Scope

Define targets and rules of engagement

Confirm applications, APIs, IP ranges, environments, testing windows, exclusions, credentials and escalation contacts.

02 • Assess

Combine automation with manual validation

Perform structured testing, validate important findings and investigate attack paths within the agreed rules of engagement.

03 • Report

Make findings actionable

Document evidence, impact, severity, affected assets and practical remediation guidance.

04 • Retest

Validate remediation

Re-examine agreed findings, update status and document residual issues or accepted risk.

Buyer FAQ

Questions organizations typically ask

What is the difference between vulnerability assessment and penetration testing?

A vulnerability assessment identifies and prioritizes weaknesses, while penetration testing adds deeper manual validation and controlled exploitation where appropriate to understand real attack paths and impact.

Do you test web applications and APIs separately?

Yes. API authorization, token handling and object-level access require specific test scenarios and should not be treated as a simple extension of browser-based testing.

Will the report be suitable for management and technical teams?

The engagement can provide an executive summary for risk owners alongside detailed technical evidence and remediation guidance for engineering teams.

Do you provide retesting?

Yes. Retesting can be included to validate remediation of agreed findings and provide an updated closure status.

Can VAPT support compliance requirements?

VAPT can provide security-testing evidence for many compliance programs, but the exact scope and frequency should be aligned to the relevant standard, contractual requirement and risk profile.

Related expertise

Explore connected EAKA IT services

Build a broader roadmap where operational, security and governance requirements overlap.

Cybersecurity Services

Explore the broader cybersecurity portfolio.

Explore →

SOC as a Service India

Combine proactive testing with continuous monitoring.

Explore →

Cybersecurity Posture Assessment

Prioritize security improvements beyond technical vulnerabilities.

Explore →

Start with a focused discovery conversation

Share your environment, priorities and deadlines. EAKA IT will recommend a pragmatic first step and an appropriate scope.

Talk to an Expert

Turn the requirement into an actionable roadmap

Get a clear view of current gaps, priorities, ownership and next steps.

Book a Consultation